Based on the legal precedence surrounding cryptographic communication, it is highly unlikely that the U.S. government can ban bitcoin.
‘Uncle Sam’ Can’t Shut Down Bitcoin
In response, fellow redditor ‘nowitsalllgone’ provided legal precedence to show why a BTC ban wouldn’t be possible.
For starters, there is legal precedent that equates the prohibition of cryptographic communication as akin to an infringement on free speech under the First Amendment.
As a computer protocol, Bitcoin represents a mathematical language, which is no different from human languages like English or French, in the eyes of the courts.
However, Bitcoin is more than an ordinary computer protocol, in that it allows value transfer across a network. This particular characteristic brings up the financial instrument angle which hostile governments keen on enacting a ban could exploit.
In the case of the U.S, going through such a route would also not work. This is because the compensation received from the transfer of information is also protected under freedom of speech — one of the five basic freedoms enshrined in the First Amendment.
So, while projects like Libra can have Congressional hearings with the threat of imposing bans, such a scenario appears highly unlikely for bitcoin.
A Ban is Unnecessary
Places like China and India provide clear evidence that bitcoin bans are counterproductive to the agenda of the government.