On Wednesday, Representative Warren Davidson suggested that Facebook Libra’s lack of decentralization placed it in the same category as other run of the mill sh*tcoins.
Libra is Not a Cryptocurrency
Events took a somewhat unexpected twist during today’s congressional hearing on the potential impacts of Facebook’s new Libra cryptocurrency. While questioning CoinShares Chief Strategy Officer, Meltem Demirors, Congressman Warren Davidson asked for clarification on the difference between Bitcoin and as he implied, a “shitcoin” like Libra. Davidson said:
A lot of people in this space will use a phrase that you may be familiar with: “there’s Bitcoin, and then there’s shitcoin”. Davidson then asked Demirors, “Are you familiar with that phrase, and what people might mean by that?”
Demirors confirmed that she was very familiar with the expression and explained that Bitcoin is decentralized whereas Libra is “highly centralized”. Demirors said that she wanted to “distinguish and draw a very clear line” and she said, “Libra is not a cryptocurrency.”
Any person can download Bitcoin’s software and run a node, whereas the Libra Association is essentially a cartel of large for-profit businesses. Demirors compared Libra to a mutual fund offering two classes of shares and reminded the audience that it will be backed by other sovereign currencies.
Libra’s Governance by For-Profit Companies Draws Concern
Davidson said that he was concerned that Libra’s centralized nature drastically different from Bitcoin’s decentralization and he explained that:
All of these features are different from many of the things people call colloquially ‘shitcoin’ because the value can be distorted by a central authority, so people do really have their assets at risk.”
Other highlights from the hearing included firebrand Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez asking Calibra CEO David Marcus who would govern Facebook’s Libra cryptocurrency.